FOR REVIEWERS

Reviewers must not have any conflicts of interest with the authors and/or the sponsors of the research. A reviewer should be competent in the specific scientific field of the submitted paper. Each paper should receive unique reviews that cannot be identical to reviews of other papers. Reviews should include the reviewer’s expert opinion on the value of the paper, a recommendation for publication, categorization, relevance assessment, and the article's compliance with the Authors' Guidelines and the Article Writing Template. The review should contribute to the decision-making process and help the author improve the quality of the paper through communication with the editor.

Any selected reviewer who knows they will be unable to complete the review within the specified timeframe should notify the editor and decline to participate in the review process. All manuscripts must be treated as confidential documents; reviewers must not share the review or information about the paper. Information obtained through the review must be confidential and must not be copied or retained.

Reviewers should alert the editor if any potential ethical issues are identified in the article.