,
University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Economics Brčko , Brčko , Bosnia and Herzegovina
,
University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Economics Brčko , Brčko , Bosnia and Herzegovina
University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Economics , Banja Luka , Bosnia and Herzegovina
In the contemporary business environment, traditional accounting systems, such as double-entry bookkeeping, face increasing criticism due to growing demands for transparency and security in financial transactions. While double-entry bookkeeping remains the foundation of modern accounting practices, its limitations are increasingly evident in the context of complex business operations and the need for robust safeguards against errors and fraud. This paper explores triple-entry accounting as an advanced alternative, leveraging blockchain technology to enhance transparency, security, and efficiency. By incorporating a third party into traditional T-accounts through a unique transaction identifier (hash), the system enables both accurate transaction recording and real-time verification, significantly reducing risks of manipulation and errors. Although the concept of triple-entry bookkeeping is not new, its revival is noteworthy given recent technological advancements. These innovations introduce a paradigm shift in financial reporting, with the potential to fundamentally transform business practices. Through a case study, this research examines the practical application of this system in real-world settings, highlighting both its benefits and challenges. The findings suggest that triple-entry accounting has the potential to significantly enhance existing practices, offering deeper insights into financial operations, better risk management, and increased reliability of financial statements. This study establishes a foundation for further research, paving the way for the broader adoption of advanced accounting models. Such models are essential for meeting the escalating demands of modern business complexities.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.