×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Contact
Scientific article

CONTEMPORARY MODELS OF NATURAL DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT

By
Jelena Kočović ,
Jelena Kočović

Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, Serbia , Belgrade , Serbia

Marija Koprivica ,
Marija Koprivica

Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, Serbia , Belgrade , Serbia

Nataša Tešić
Nataša Tešić

University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Business Economics Bijeljina, Bosna and Herzegovina , Bijeljina , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The Agenda adopted by the Assembly of the United Nations in September 2015, entitled 'The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development', emphasizes as one of itsmajor goals reducing the vulnerability of the population to climate change and natural disaster risks emerging as a consequence of the change. Catastrophe risk insurance is certainly one of the key factors that can contribute to the sustainable economic, social and environmental development of the country. Therefore, the subject of the paper is presenting the contemporary models of natural disaster risk management. The aim of the paper is to propose a model based on the existing catastrophic risk management models in other countries that could be applied in Bosnia and Herzegovina as well. Special emphasis will be placed, within the explanation of the existing models, on the ways of financing the elimination of adverse consequences of natural disasters.

References

1.
Antal RM. The premium for mandatory house insurance in Romania – considerations regarding its financial solvability. 2012.
2.
Brown JT. Introduction to FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP. 2016.
3.
Cavallo E, Noy I. Natural disasters and the economy – a survey. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics. 2011;5(1):63–102.
4.
C.C.S. Natural Catastrophes Insurance Cover - A Diversity of Systems. 2008.
5.
Risk Financing in Developing Countries. 2009.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.