Collective management of copyright and related rights, with collective management organizations that act as an intermediary between authors and other holders of copyright and related rights, on the one hand, and users of protected subject matter, on the other hand, is currently recognized in legal literature and legal practice as the most optimal means of exercise and financing of certain forms of use of copyright works, but also of related rights. Otherwise, these rights would be very difficult to exercise or could not be exercised at all individually. The authors argue that collective management of copyright could be further optimized and new model thereof drawn upon the centennial history of social security public funds. Following the review of selected literature, the authors offer several arguments for the new model of copyright and related rights protection within public funds.
Leite AMR, Leite EMA, Ribeiro HNR, Alves SRP, Sardinha LF. From Bismarck to Beveridge: Contributions for the Understanding of Different Social Security Models. In: Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings Varazdin. 2022. p. 255–64.
2.
Yi I. Social Protection, Social Security and Social Service in a Development Context: Transformative Social Policy Approach. Journal of International Development Cooperation. 2010;4:57–84.
3.
Towse R, Handke C. Regulating copyright collecting societies: current policy in Europe. 2007;
4.
The 60¬year copyright levies saga: High time for reform. 2024;
5.
Šunderić B. O pojmu socijalnog rizika. 2011;
6.
Stojanović D i A, O. Uvod u građansko pravo. 2001;
7.
Solomon LD, Barrow GA. Privatization of social security: legal and policy analysis. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy. 1995;5(1):9–34.
8.
Quadagno J. The Social Security Program and the Private Sector Alternative: Lessons from History. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development. 1987;25(3):239–46.
9.
Pacinotti L. From the Poor Laws to Social Insurance: Administrative Dimensions and European Projections. Historia et Ius. 2024;26:1–19.
10.
Marković S. Pravo intelektualne svojine i informaciono društvo. 2018;
11.
Marilović Đ. Compulsory Social Security Insurance Between a Subjective Right and a Social Value. In: Collection of papers / International scientific conference Law and Social Values. 2023. p. 465–85.
12.
Ćeranić D, Ivanović S. Inheritance of Author’s Rights in Republic of Srpska. Yearbook Of the Faculty of Law in East Sarajevo. 2017;VIII(1):19–41.
13.
Law on the Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights. Official Gazette BiH. 2010;(63/2010).
14.
Ivanović S. Collective Administration of Copyright and Related Rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Collection of Papers. 2011.
15.
Heinrich A. The Emergence of the Socialist Healthcare Model After the First World War. In: International Impacts on Social Policy Global Dynamics of Social Policy. 2022.
16.
Harada H. Establishing Partnership between Public and Private Law in Globalized Policy-Making and Enforcement Processes: Focus on Social Security Law. Japanese Yearbook of International Law. 2014;57:217–27.
17.
Handke C. The Economics of Collective Copyright Management, Handbook of the Economics of Copyright. 2013;
18.
EU social security coordination. European Commission, Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
19.
Dimitrijević M, Obradović G. Funding Social Insurance Theoretical Aspect. Facta Universitatis, Series: Law and Politics. 2005;3:53–61.
20.
Damjanović J. The Significance of Commercial Law Contracts in the New Economic Reality. Novi Ekonomist. 2024;18(1):32–9.
21.
Cutler DM, Johnson R. The birth and growth of the social insurance state: Explaining old age and medical insurance across countries. Public Choice. 2004;120:87–121.
22.
Chase D, Hemadri N. Social Security Privatization: The Case of Chile. Case Western Reserve University Journal Of Economics. 2025;3(1):39–41.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
