×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review

COLLECTIVE MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATIONS: SHOULD COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGTHS BE PROTECTED WITHIN PUBLIC FUNDS

By
Đorđe Marilović Orcid logo ,
Đorđe Marilović

Faculty of Law, University of East Sarajevo , Pale , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Svjetlana Ivanović Orcid logo
Svjetlana Ivanović

Faculty of Law, University of East Sarajevo , Pale , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Collective management of copyright and related rights, with collective management organizations that act as an intermediary between authors and other holders of copyright and related rights, on the one hand, and users of protected subject matter, on the other hand, is currently recognized in legal literature and legal practice as the most optimal means of exercise and financing of certain forms of use of copyright works, but also of related rights. Otherwise, these rights would be very difficult to exercise or could not be exercised at all individually. The authors argue that collective management of copyright could be further optimized and new model thereof drawn upon the centennial history of social security public funds. Following the review of selected literature, the authors offer several arguments for the new model of copyright and related rights protection within public funds.

References

1.
Leite AMR, Leite EMA, Ribeiro HNR, Alves SRP, Sardinha LF. From Bismarck to Beveridge: Contributions for the Understanding of Different Social Security Models. In: Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings Varazdin. 2022. p. 255–64.
2.
Yi I. Social Protection, Social Security and Social Service in a Development Context: Transformative Social Policy Approach. Journal of International Development Cooperation. 2010;4:57–84.
3.
Towse R, Handke C. Regulating copyright collecting societies: current policy in Europe. 2007;
4.
The 60¬year copyright levies saga: High time for reform. 2024;
5.
Šunderić B. O pojmu socijalnog rizika. 2011;

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.