×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review

RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE CONTRACTING PARTIES UPON CONCLUSION OF A LICENSE AGREEMENT IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY

By
Jelena Damjanović Orcid logo
Jelena Damjanović

Faculty of Business Economics Bijeljina, University of East Sarajevo , Bijeljina , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The digital economy is a term originally used to denote a new type of economic movement that emerged under the influence of the fourth industrial revolution. The unexpected expansion of modern technology, or rather the use of modern technology, has led to the fact that most of the economy takes place within the digital economy, and therefore the digital economy is not a novelty, nor is it a type of economy, but rather the economy itself. The subject of this research paper aims to determine the importance obligations of the parties responsible for the license agreement, the licensor and the licensee, in light of newly emerging relationships of the modern economy аnd Industrial Property Rights. The research objectives are primarily related to and expressed through an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of contractual obligations from the license agreement This paper will use all methods that could contribute to its higher quality. Primarily referring to methods that are characteristic of social research, in which scientific description and content analysis (with synthesis) will be highlighted, followed by inductive-deductive, historical and comparative analysis. The hypothesis of this paper is that the better regulation of the rights and obligations of the contracting parties under the license agreement leads to a better functioning of the digital economy. The result of the work is to point out the possibilities and legal instruments that, in conjunction with harmonized regulations, can lead to the stimulation of economic development in the new economic reality caused by the multipolar world..

References

1.
Andriychuk О. EU Digital Competition Law: The Socio-legal Foundations. In: Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. 2023.
2.
Besarović V. Intelektualna svojina, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu – Centar za izdavaštvo i informisanje. 2011;
3.
Ivanović S. Kaznena naknada štete u pravu intelektualne svojine/ Punitive Damages in Intellectual Property Law. In: Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu. 2017.
4.
Klamert M. What We Talk About When We Talk About Harmonisation. In: Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. 2015.
5.
decision of the Constitutional Court of the SFRY and 57/89. - Constitutional Charter Zakon o obligacionim odnosima – ZOO, Službeni list SFRJ, br. 2003;29(29/78, 39/85):45 89-.
6.
Marilović Đ. Legality in Budgetary Law / ZAKONITOST U BUDŽETSKOM PRAVU, Collection of Papers “Law Between Creation and Interpretation“. East Sarajevo. 2023;
7.
Marković S. Pravo intelektuane svojine, Službeni glasnik. 2000;
8.
Mirović D. Poslovno pravo, Fakultet poslovne ekonomije Bijeljina - Ekonomski fakultet Brčko. 2009;
9.
Odermatt J. The Court of Justice of the European Union and International Dispute Settlement: Conflict, Cooperation and Coexistence. In: Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. 2022.
10.
Popović V, Vukadinović R. Međunarodno poslovno pravo, posebni deo ugovori međunarode trgovine, Pravni fakultet u Banja Luci – Centar za pravo Evropske unije u Kragujevcu, Banja Luka. 2010;
11.
Vasiljević M. Trgovinsko pravo, Pravni fakultet Beograd. 2006;
12.
Velimirović M. Privredno pravo, Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Srpskom Sarajevu. 2001;
13.
Witt A. Platform Regulation in Europe— Per Se Rules to the Rescue? Journal of Competition Law & Economics. 2022;18(ue 3).
14.
Wurmnest W. Assessing Antitrust Damages in Follow-On Actions Against Cartels. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. 2023;25.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.