×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Scientific article

LEADERSHIP IN A MULTIPOLAR WORLD: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LEADERSHIP STYLES IN A MULTIPOLAR ENVIRONMENT

By
Biljana Kovačević Orcid logo ,
Biljana Kovačević

Faculty of Business Economics Bijeljina, University of East Sarajevo , Bijeljina , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Ana Aleksić Mirić Orcid logo ,
Ana Aleksić Mirić

Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade , Belgrade , Serbia

Katarina Božić Orcid logo
Katarina Božić

Faculty of Business Economics Bijeljina, University of East Sarajevo , Bijeljina , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

This paper explores leadership styles in a multipolar world, focusing on USA, Europe Russia, China, and India. The research highlights how leadership approaches are shaped by the cultural, political, and economic contexts of these regions. Despite fundamental differences, several universal leadership traits emerge as key factors in the global landscape. This paper provides a systematic literature review on leadership styles in multipolar environments, comparing approaches across different geopolitical, corporate, and organizational contexts. Through an analysis of existing research, the study identifies key leadership characteristics that foster adaptability, collaboration, and strategic decision-making in a world where power is distributed among multiple actors. The USA adopts a predominantly democratic leadership style, encouraging innovation, employee autonomy, and transformational leadership. European leadership styles vary widely, balancing democratic and transformational approaches, though some regions still exhibit authoritarian tendencies. Russian leaders favor a mix of authoritarian and paternalistic styles, reinforced by strong political influence. Chinese leadership is often authoritarian and paternalistic, emphasizing centralized control and stability. Indian leadership combines authoritarian elements with flexibility, allowing for industry-specific adaptations. In a multipolar world, leaders must navigate complex environments, balancing stability with innovation.

References

1.
Taleghani G, Salmani D, Taatian A. Survey of leadership styles in different cultures. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies (Formerly known as Iranian Journal of Management Studies. 2010;3(3):91–111.
2.
Peters MA. The emerging multipolar world order: A preliminary analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2023;55(14):1653–63.
3.
Ramjit DM. Global Diplomacy in a Multipolar Era. Law, Economics and Society. 2025;1(1):107–107.
4.
Rawat PS, Lyndon S. Effect of paternalistic leadership style on subordinate’s trust: an Indian study. Journal of Indian Business Research. 2016;8(4):264–77.
5.
Ren S, Xie Y, Zhu Y, Warner M. New generation employees’ preferences towards leadership style in China. Asia Pacific Business Review. 2018;24(4):437–58.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.