This paper explores leadership styles in a multipolar world, focusing on USA, Europe Russia, China, and India. The research highlights how leadership approaches are shaped by the cultural, political, and economic contexts of these regions. Despite fundamental differences, several universal leadership traits emerge as key factors in the global landscape. This paper provides a systematic literature review on leadership styles in multipolar environments, comparing approaches across different geopolitical, corporate, and organizational contexts. Through an analysis of existing research, the study identifies key leadership characteristics that foster adaptability, collaboration, and strategic decision-making in a world where power is distributed among multiple actors. The USA adopts a predominantly democratic leadership style, encouraging innovation, employee autonomy, and transformational leadership. European leadership styles vary widely, balancing democratic and transformational approaches, though some regions still exhibit authoritarian tendencies. Russian leaders favor a mix of authoritarian and paternalistic styles, reinforced by strong political influence. Chinese leadership is often authoritarian and paternalistic, emphasizing centralized control and stability. Indian leadership combines authoritarian elements with flexibility, allowing for industry-specific adaptations. In a multipolar world, leaders must navigate complex environments, balancing stability with innovation.
Taleghani G, Salmani D, Taatian A. Survey of leadership styles in different cultures. Interdisciplinary Journal of Management Studies (Formerly known as Iranian Journal of Management Studies. 2010;3(3):91–111.
2.
Peters MA. The emerging multipolar world order: A preliminary analysis. Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2023;55(14):1653–63.
3.
Ramjit DM. Global Diplomacy in a Multipolar Era. Law, Economics and Society. 2025;1(1):107–107.
4.
Rawat PS, Lyndon S. Effect of paternalistic leadership style on subordinate’s trust: an Indian study. Journal of Indian Business Research. 2016;8(4):264–77.
5.
Ren S, Xie Y, Zhu Y, Warner M. New generation employees’ preferences towards leadership style in China. Asia Pacific Business Review. 2018;24(4):437–58.
6.
Sanchez-Runde C, Nardon L, Steers RM. Looking beyond Western leadership models: Implications for global managers. Organizational dynamics. 2011;40(3):207–13.
7.
Sharma N, Gautam O, Agrawal P. Authentic Leaders for an Engaged and Satisfied Workforce: An Evidence from India. Gurukul Business Review. 2021;17(1).
8.
Stoner K. Russia and the challenges of global leadership. International Journal. 2024;79(3):458–61.
9.
Takeuchi R, Wang AC, Farh JL. Asian conceptualizations of leadership: Progresses and challenges. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2020;7(1):233–56.
10.
Ni AJ. Leadership and power game in a multi-polarizing world: The competition between the US and China. Open Journal of Political Science. 2020;10(2):253–77.
11.
Thapa R. Uncommon Reality: Finding the Unipolar World in Bipolar and Multipolar Discourses. Unity Journal. 2025;6(1):184–201.
12.
Tranfield D, Denyer D, Smart P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence‐informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management. 2003;14(3):207–22.
13.
Verma N, Bhat AB, Rangnekar S, Barua MK. Association between leadership style and decision making style in Indian organisations. Journal of Management Development. 2015;34(3):246–69.
14.
Vines D. Chinese leadership of macroeconomic policymaking in a multipolar world. China Economic Review. 2016;40:286–96.
15.
Zhou L, Zhao S, Tian F, Zhang X, Chen S. Visionary leadership and employee creativity in China. International Journal of Manpower. 2018;39(1):93–105.
16.
Zhou Y, Kim S, Rui D. Chivalrous idealist and pragmatic strategist: the influence of Mohist values on Ma Yun’s leadership in China. Asia Pacific Business Review. 2019;25(2):273–87.
17.
18.
Hofstede G. Geert Hofstede cultural dimensions. 2009;
19.
Antonopoulou H, Halkiopoulos C, Barlou O, Beligiannis G. Digital leader and transformational leadership in higher education. In: INTED2021 Proceedings. 2021. p. 9616–24.
20.
Ashkanasy NM. Leadership in the Asian century: Lessons from GLOBE. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour. 2002;5(3):150–63.
21.
Balabanova E, Efendiev A. The voice of employees in Russian business organizations: conceptualization and empirical analysis. Mir Rossii. 2015;24(3):61–87.
22.
Balabanova E, Rebrov A, Koveshnikov A. Managerial styles in privately owned domestic organizations in Russia: Heterogeneity, antecedents, and organizational implications. Management and Organization Review. 2018;14(1):37–72.
23.
Caza A, Caza BB, Posner BZ. Transformational leadership across cultures: Follower perception and satisfaction. Administrative Sciences. 2021;11(1):32.
24.
Dorfman PW, Howell JP, Hibino S, Lee JK, Tate U, Bautista A. Leadership in Western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. The leadership quarterly. 1997;8(3):233–74.
25.
Felzensztein C, Tretiakov A, Velez-Ocampo JF. Parentalistic leadership and crisis responses by small entrepreneurial firms. Small Enterprise Research. 2024;31(2):198–216.
26.
Fey CF, Adaeva M, Vitkovskaia A. Developing a model of leadership styles: what works best in Russia? International business review. 2001;10(6):615–43.
27.
Acharya A, Estevadeordal A, Goodman LW. Multipolar or multiplex? Interaction capacity, global cooperation and world order. International Affairs. 2023;99(6):2339–65.
28.
I.M.F. 2023;
29.
Kim M, Beehr TA. Empowering leadership improves employees’ positive psychological states to result in more favorable behaviors. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 2023;34(10):2002–38.
30.
Kobernyuk E, Stiles D, Ellson T. International joint ventures in Russia: Cultures’ influences on alliance success. Journal of business research. 2014;67(4):471–7.
31.
Lund HH. We are equal, but I am the leader’: leadership enactment in early childhood education in Norway. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 2024;27(6):1228–53.
32.
Mathew J, Rajam K, Nair S. Leadership Style and Work Engagement: A Comparison of Private and Public Sector Firms in India. Vision. 2024;28(4):523–8.
33.
Mathisen GE, Einarsen S, Mykletun R. Creative leaders promote creative organizations. International Journal of Manpower. 2012;33(4):367–82.
34.
McCarthy DJ, Puffer SM, Darda SV. Convergence in entrepreneurial leadership style: Evidence from Russia. California management review. 2010;52(4):48–72.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
