×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Contact
Scientific article

This is an early access version

Cross-Country Differences, Dynamics and Convergence of Transport Tax Revenue-to-GDP Ratios: Evidence from OECD Countries

By
Giannis Adamos Orcid logo ,
Giannis Adamos

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki , Thessaloniki , Greece

Jadranka Đurović Todorović Orcid logo ,
Jadranka Đurović Todorović

University of Nis , Niš , Serbia

Branimir Kalaš Orcid logo ,
Branimir Kalaš

Faculty of Economics in Subotica, Universtity of Novi Sad Serbia

Milica Ristic Cakic Orcid logo
Milica Ristic Cakic
Contact Milica Ristic Cakic

University of Niš , Niš , Serbia

Abstract

Transport tax revenue-to-GDP ratios differ considerably across OECD countries, both in their levels and changes over time. This paper examines these differences, the dynamics of transport tax revenue as a share of GDP, and convergence between 2017 and 2024. The analysis covers 38 countries and uses a balanced panel of 304 country-year observations. The results show a general downward trend in transport tax revenue relative to GDP. Compared with 2017, the decline became statistically significant in 2019 and reached 0.104 percentage points of GDP by 2024. Countries with higher initial transport tax revenue-to-GDP ratios experienced larger absolute reductions, providing some evidence of convergence. However, this finding is not confirmed by the logarithmic specification or measures of cross-country dispersion. The results also show no significant change in the level or trend of transport tax revenue relative to GDP around 2020, as the decline had started earlier and continued afterwards. These findings demonstrate that declining transport tax revenue-to-GDP ratios and cross-country convergence represent distinct processes and highlight the persistence of substantial heterogeneity across OECD economies. From a policy perspective, the results underscore the importance of monitoring the fiscal evolution of transport taxation at a time when changes in mobility, vehicle technologies, and environmental policy are reshaping traditional transport-related tax bases.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.A. and J.Đ.T.; Formal Analysis, G.A. and J.Đ.T.; Project administration, G.A. and J.Đ.T.; Supervision, G.A., J.Đ.T. and B.K.; Writing – review & editing, G.A. and J.Đ.T.; Software, B.K. and M.R.C.; Writing – original draft, B.K. and M.R.C.; Data curation, M.R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding Statement

This article is based upon work from COST Action CA20138 – Network on Water-Energy-Food Nexus for a Low-Carbon Economy in Europe and Beyond (NEXUSNET), supported by COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology).

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.