×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review

APPLICATION OF CROWDFUNDING AS AN ALTERNATIVE SOURCE OF PROJECT FINANCING IN EU COUNTRIES - ASSUMPTIONS OF ITS DEVELOPMENT IN BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA AND CROATIA

By
Suzana Stevanović ,
Suzana Stevanović

University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Business Economics Bijeljina , Bijeljina , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Ivan Milenković
Ivan Milenković

University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Economics in Subotic , Subotica , Serbia

Abstract

A new economic trend in the financing of projects, start-ups, innovative projects and many other projects from various fields (music, film, games) is widespread today and its called crowdfunding or group financing. With the development of new technologies, and thus social networks around the world, it creates the possibility and potential advantage of associating around the world in raising funds in an alternative way. Crowdfunding can be organized in several forms or models. The basic division is the one that is carried out by the European Commission: Reward-based crowdfunding, Donation-based crowdfunding, Share-based crowdfunding and Investment-based crowdfunding. The crowdfunding market is constantly growing. As conditions for traditional funding become more stringent, crowdfunding could be a potential key to success. Prospects for the development of crowdfunding in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia are reflected in the legal regulation of this method of financing, which would facilitate administrative work, reduce handling costs and create legal certainty. Following the established regulations, intensive attention should be dedicated to the promotion of crowdfunding and "raising awareness" of citizens, pointing out the possible benefits and advantages that it offers. This will take some time, so that in the foreseeable future, alternative financing of crowdfunding will gain in importance in Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia.

References

1.
Wired Magazine.
2.
Bishnu K, Kenji K, Takaaki H. 2018;
3.
Bradford C. Crowdfunding and the federal securities laws. Columbia Business Law Review. 2012;(1):1–150.
4.
Bradford C. Crowdfunding and the Federal Securities Law"; Columbia Business Law Review Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance. 2012;
5.
Commission E. Identifying market and regulatory obstacles to cross-border development of crowdfunding in the EU. European Commission. 2017;
6.
Crowdfunding’s Potential for the Developing World. InfoDev. 2013;
7.
Douglas C, Lars H. 2018;
8.
Esma. European Securites and Markets PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL.
9.
Crowdfunding: Mapping EU markets and evenets study; Executive Summary. European Commission. 2015;
10.
Parliament E. Briefing. 2017;
11.
Hrvoje H. 2017;
12.
Hulme M, Wright C. Internet-based social lending: past, present and future. Soc Futures Obs Retrieved. 2006;
13.
Đurđenić K. Crowdfunding -Croatian legal perspective and comparison to other sources of financing. 2016;
14.
Linas S, Sadzuis. Existing Legal Issues for Crowdfunding Regulation in European Union Member States. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology. 2017;
15.
16.
Mollick E. The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur.e. 2014;(1):1–16.
17.
Can P2P Lending Reinvent Banking? report. 2015;
18.
Roberto B, Flavio P, S. The Crowdfunding Bible: How to Raise Money for Any Startup, Video Game or Project. 2016;
19.
Dresner S. 2014;
20.
Crowdfundig s Potential for the Developing World. Washington DC: Information for Development Program (infoDev)/The World Bank. 2013;
21.
2016;
22.
Magazine W. 2020;
23.
World, Group. Western Balkans Labor Market Trends. 2017;

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.