×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Scientific article

FORECASTING PANDEMIC TAX REVENUES IN A SMALL, OPEN ECONOMY: THE CASE OF BULGARIA

By
Fabio Ashtar Telarico
Fabio Ashtar Telarico

Centre for Southeastern European Studies , Graz , Austria

Abstract

Tax analysis and forecasting of revenues are of paramount importance to ensure fiscal policy’s viability and sustainability. However, the measures taken to contain the spread of the recent pandemic pose an unprecedented challenge to established models and approaches. This paper proposes a model to forecast tax revenues in Bulgaria for the fiscal years 2020–2022 built in accordance with the International Monetary Fund's recommendations on a dataset covering the period between 1995 and 2019. The study further discusses the actual trustworthiness of official Bulgarian forecasts, contrasting those figures with the model previously estimated. This study's quantitative results both confirm the pandemic's assumed negative impact on tax revenues and prove that econometrics can be tweaked to produce consistent revenue forecasts even in the relatively-unexplored case of Bulgaria offering new insights to policymakers and advocates.

References

1.
Keen MM. The Anatomy of the VAT. 2013.
2.
Morozumi A, Santiago Acosta Ormaechea. The Value Added Tax and Growth: Design Matters“. In: Working Paper 96 IMF Working Papers. 2019.
3.
RB M. Srednosročna bюdžetna prognoza za perioda 2017 - 2019 g. [‎Mid-term budget forecast for the period 2017 - 2019‎]“. In: Ministerstvo na Finansiite na Republika Bŭlgaria. 2016.
4.
Milcheva E. Koronavirus: kakvi merki predpriema bъlgarskoto pravitelstvo [Coronavirus: what measures the Bulgarian government is taking]“. Deutsche Welle. 2020;15.
5.
Sivata ikonomika se e svila do 21%, no lipsata na reformi zabavя tempa [The informal economy has shrunk to 21%, but the lack of reforms is slowing down ]“. Mediapool.bg. 2020;15.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.