×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review

SECURITIZATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE WAY OF MANAGING THE RISK OF CATASTROPHIC EVENTS

By
Mirela Mitrašević
Mirela Mitrašević
Contact Mirela Mitrašević

University of East Sarajevo Faculty of Business Economics , Bijeljina , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Catastrophic events caused by naturaldisasters and human activities pose a uniquechallenge for insurers, because they make itdifficult to estimate expected claims and can causedisruption to the insurance market and imposesignificant costs on government, businesses andindividuals. The lack of available coverage ofthese risks in the market, due to the insolvency orunwillingness of insurers to ensure catastrophicevents, can significantly impede the economicrecovery and development of the country. For thisreason insurers have sought alternative ways ofcovering these extreme losses, and one of them, atransfer of the risk of insurance to the capitalmarkets represents the main subject of thisresearch. The aim of this maneuver is to presentthe advantages and disadvantages of theinstruments through which the transfer ofinsurance risk to financial markets is carried out,as well as to indicate the legal and otherassumptions necessary for the functioning anddevelopment of this market.

References

1.
Bruggeman V. Capital Market Instruments for Catastrophe Risk Financing. 2001;
2.
Carayannopoulos P, Kovacs P. Insurance Securitization. Catastrophic event exposure and the role of insurance linked securities in addressing risk, Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction. 2003;
3.
Cummins D, Weiss M. Convergence of insurance and financial markets: hybrid and securitized risk-transfer solutions. The Journal of Risk and Insurance. 2009;(3).
4.
Cummins J, Geman H. Pricing Insurance Catastrophe Futures and Call Spreads: An Arbitrage Approach. Journal of Fixed Income. 1995;46–57.
5.
Eprs. Common rules and new framework for securitisation. 2018;
6.
Hammer V, Singer A. Insurance derivatives: a tax angle. Journal of Taxation of Financial Products. 2001;
7.
Iais. Issues paper on non-life insurance securitisation. 2003;
8.
Kovacs P, Kunreuther H. Managing Catastrophic Risk: Lessons from Canada. 2001;
9.
Laurenzano V. Securitization of Insurance Risk: A Perspective for Regulators. Journal of Insurance Regulation. 1998;(2).
10.
Maes S, Schoutens W. Contingent Capital: An In-Depth Discussion. 2012;(1/2-2012).
11.
Torre-Enciso M, Laye I, J. Financing catastrophe risk in the capital markets. Int J Emergency Management. 2001;(1).
12.
Mcdonald R. Contingent Capital with a Dual Price Trigger. 2011;1553430.
13.
Mcghee C, Faust J. The Growing Appetite for Catastrophe Risk: The Catastrophe Bond Market at Year-End. 2005;
14.
Naic. 2001;
15.
Naic. 2002;
16.
Carayannopoulos P. Insurance Securitization Catastrophic event exposure and the role of insurance linked securities in addressing risk. 2003;
17.
Shang K. Understanding Contingent Capital. 2013;
18.
Re S. The fundamentals of insurance-linked securities. 2011;

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.