The article substantiates writing a methodology to study the present condition and development of production technologies at Russian manufacturing enterprises in the context of priority scientific and technological development of Russian economy. The basic methodology used in the study are system and process approaches that are applied to the scientific and practical material of general systems theory, organization theory, as well as engineering and technological approach. The scientific concept of production technologies development at manufacturing enterprises is aimed at identifying the multifaceted nature of technologies and expanding multiple use of new technologies in domestic manufacturing industry within the framework of priorities for the scientific and technical complex of the Russian Federation. A business model that can provide achieving of the task, affect the technology orientation of a manufacturing enterprise and the choice of an acceptable business decision is proposed and substantiated as a practical implementation of the concept of production technologies development. The main applications of obtained results will be adjusting the content of state programs by adding subprograms (sections) on technical re-equipment in accordance with new technological mode; identifying the events aimed at supporting research in the field of digital and additive production, robotics, and new production technologies in competitions held among institutes for the development.
Turovets O, Rodionova V. On Some Issues of Providing Effective Organization of High-tech Production //. Production Facilitator. 2016;1(68):47–53.
2.
Miller A, Miller M. Conceptual Foundations of Industrial Production Technologisation // Izv. USUE. 2016;6(68):88–97.
3.
Ashby W. Introduction to Cybernetics. Moscow. 2009;432.
4.
Tsvetkov V, Sukharev O. Russia’s Economic Growth: a New Management Model. Moscow, Lenand. 2017;352.
5.
Schwab K. The Fourth Industrial Revolution Moscow, Eksmo. 2016;138.
6.
Schumpeter J. Theory of economic development (study of business profits, capital, credit, percent and a conjuncture cycle. 2008.
7.
Technological Development of Economic Sectors / Federal State Statistics Service. In: -http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/ru/ statistics / economydevelopment / # date of treatment 15032019.
8.
Science. Innovation and Information Society / Federal State Statistics Service.-http://www.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/ statistics / science _and_innovations / date of treatment 15.03.2019.
9.
Streltsov A. Specifics of Shaping and Implementing Industrial Policy in Modern Conditions //. Economic Sciences. 2016;138:74–8.
10.
Gerasina Y. The Impact of Global Transformation on the Functions and Dysfunctions of the Management of the National Economic Reproduction //. Economic Systems. 2016;1:7–10.
11.
Posner M. International Trade and Technology Change: Milestones in Economic Thought. Vol. 6. 2006.
12.
Kleiner G. Systemic Modernization of Domestic Enterprises: Theoretical Foundation, Motives. Principles // Regional Economy. 2017;13, 1:13–24.
13.
Varfolomeev V. High-tech Production: Development Resources, Features of Innovation Process and Efficiency Evaluation //. Science and Practice. 2013;10:87–101.
14.
Shepard H, EDundon. Innovations: How to Identify Trends and Reap Benefit. Moscow, Vershina. 2006;304.
15.
Klochkov V. Analysis of the Impact of Technological Changes in the Energy Sector on the Sustainability of Russian Economy // National Interests. Priorities and Security. 2001;4(349):684–98.
16.
Frolov I. High-tech Sector of Russian Industry: State, Trends, Mechanisms of Innovation Development. 2007;583.
17.
Komkov N. Conditions for Structural Innovation Policy Development of Russian Economy // Modernization. Innovations, Development. 2017;1(29):80–7.
18.
Varshavsky A. On the Strategy of Scientific and Technological Development of Russian Economy //. 2017.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
