University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering , Doboj , Bosnia and Herzegovina
The logistics performance index (LPI) represents an important indicator of the state of logistics and its development in countries. The LPI is directly linked to the level of economic system development, and as such provides an adequate basis for the improvement of economy, through logistics and trade. The aim of this paper is to determine the impact of sensitivity analysis on the evaluation and ranking of the LPI in the Balkan countries, according to the report of the World Bank. Sensitivity analysis implies the change of the importance of six criteria based on which the LPI ranking is done. The multi-criteria decision-making model (MCDM), which consists of CRITIC and MARCOS methods for determining the LPI rank in the Balkan countries, was previously used. Criteria weights are simulated through 36 scenarios, whereby the weights of the observed criteria change in the range of 15% - 90%. The final results show that criteria values play very important role in the ranking of the Balkan countries, when it comes to the LPI.
4
Ali Aygün Yürüyen, Bora Topal
(2025)
G7 ÜLKELERİNİN LOJİSTİK PERFORMANSLARININ PSI TABANLI COBRA YÖNTEMİ İLE İNCELENMESİ
Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(29)
10.53092/duiibfd.1601852
Aslıhan Turgut
(2025)
GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN LOJİSTİK PAZAR PERFORMANSLARINA GÖRE KÜMELENMESİ
Journal of Yaşar University, 20(79)
10.19168/jyasar.1581854
Ali Aygün Yürüyen, Hüseyin Altay
(2025)
Evaluating the Logistics Performance of One Belt One Road Project Countries with Multi Criteria Decision Making Methods
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2)
10.30798/makuiibf.1609904
Mali Ju, Ivan Mirović, Vesna Petrović, Živko Erceg, Željko Stević
(2024)
A Novel Approach for the Assessment of Logistics Performance Index of EU Countries
Economics, 18(1)
10.1515/econ-2022-0074The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.