×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Review

THE ENTREPRENEURIAL STATE AND CRISIS

By
Vesna Petrović ,
Vesna Petrović
Ivan Mirović
Ivan Mirović

University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Business Economics Bijeljina

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the relationship between the entrepreneurial state and the crisis (caused by economic and non-economic reasons and vice versa). Thus, it is about the interactive attitude of the entrepreneurial state in resolving the crisis and the impact of the crisis on the further development of new economic competencies and competencies of the state in the economy. The entrepreneurial state is seen as an entrepreneur and one of the most important economic actors, which accepts long-term investment risks, bearing in mind the broader picture and the common good. The development of new technologies and new technology companies in the United States and other developed countries has been possible, thanks to the investment of the American entrepreneurial state and its agencies. We start from the assumption that the American crisis, in 2008. caused by high debts, the private sector, not the US public debt, which today is enormously high and skyrocketing. At the heart of this consideration is the thesis that the classical economic theory of non-interference of the state in economic life, which stands aside in the recent era of the development of global capitalism, does not hold water. On the contrary, it turns out that government risky investment in the long run is the basis of a modern economy in which the private sector can develop only on the premises of this huge investment in the development of modern new technologies. Most innovation today and research institutes in the United States are due to the investments of the American state. The paper discusses the impact of the crisis on the understanding of the entrepreneurial state and its role in innovation, the role of new technologies and innovations in economic growth, entrepreneurial state and risks, entrepreneurial state and knowledge economy, entrepreneurial state in "pushing" versus "pulling" the green industrial revolution and the cost of investment, innovation, and development of the American entrepreneurial state.

References

1.
Kejnz J. Opšta teorija zaposlenosti,kamate i novca.
2.
Veber M. Protestantska etika i duh kapitalizma, Mediterran Publishing.
3.
Prestowitz c. Apple Makes Good Products but Flawed Arguments’. Foreign Policy. 2012;23. januar.
4.
Polanyi K. The Great Transformation: The political and Economic Orgins of Our Time.Boston:Beacon. 2001;
5.
Pizano D. Razgovor s velikim ekonomistima. 2015.
6.
Mirović I. Strane banke u zemljama zapadnog Balkana.
7.
Mirović I. Novac i međunarodni monetarni sistem, Eseji o novcu. 2020.
8.
Mazzucato M, A. Shipman.(2014).’Acounting for Productive Investment and Value Creation’.Industrial and Corporate Change 23,no:1:1-27.
9.
Martinot. E.(2010).’Renewable Power for China:Past,Present,and Future’. In: Fronties of Energy and Power Engineering in China4,no3. p. 287–94.
10.
Macukato M. Preduzetnička drzava, Rušenje mitova o sukobu privatnog i društvenog sektora,Akademska knjiga. 2020;22.
11.
Abramovitz M. Resource and Output Trends in the United States since 1870.New. 1956.
12.
Fridman M. Sloboda izbora,Global.
13.
Fridman. M.(1953)’’Metodologija pozitivne ekonomije. U Esejima o pozitivnoj ekonomiji.Čikago,University of Chicago Press,3-43.
14.
Freeman,C.(1995).’’The -National System of Innovation- in Historical Perspective’. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 19(1:5-24).
15.
Christensen CM. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Tecnologies Cause Great Firms to Fail.
16.
Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The new Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Tecnology. 2003.
17.
Barca S ’Energy. Property, and the Industrial Revolution Narrative’. Ecological Economics. 70:1309–15.
18.
Andersen R. “‘The Silent Green Revolution’” Underway at the Department of Energy’.
19.
Adner R. The Wide Lens: A New Strategy for Innovation.New York:Portfolio Penguin.

Citation

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.